by John Parker | Mar 14, 2014 | Business Analysis, Project Management, Uncategorized |
Normally, trends and projections come out in December or January. These are a little late, but at least they still make the first quarter in 2014. Here are my predictions of key trends that we will see affect business analysis and project management in 2014. 1. Agile Continues to Grow – Agile adoption will continue to grow. This will mean many changes in terms of how requirements are developed and managed. Requirement “shall” statements will be replaced with user stories. The three C’s model of users stories: Card, Confirmation, and Conversations will continue to grow. PMs and BAs will continue to redefine their roles in the agile world of self-managing teams and product backlogs. 2. Managing Data not Documents – As agile adoption continues, the need for large paper based requirement documents will go away. Requirements will be managed as data in a backlog, not as long paper-based business requirement documents (BRDs) or Functional Requirement Specifications (FRS). 3. Dual-Track Agile Takes Off – Agile will be difficult and a cultural challenge for many organizations where there are multiple teams and resources are not collocated. “User story hell” will become a reality for many organizations as teams continue to spend more and more time grooming the backlog. Many organizations will adopt dual-track agile or some variant to better manage discovery activities. This will enable lower costs as requirements will be validated using less expensive methods than code. 4. More Emphasis on Business Change – The BABOK Version 3 will be released sometime in 2014. There are big changes coming to the role of business analysis. The focus will be much...
by John Parker | Mar 10, 2014 | Project Management, Uncategorized |
According to the Standish Group, over 60% of projects fail or are challenged. Gartner Group 2011 research shows the same story; only it paints a slightly worse picture. Based on these statistics, program/portfolio managers and PMOs need to have skills for rescuing troubled projects. Determining if You Have a Troubled Project It is important to determine if you have a troubled project before any significant intervention is taken. It is best to do this using predefined criterion that are administered at the PMO or portfolio level. The following criteria provide some examples: Project Planning The project does not have an agreed upon vision and clear set of objectives. Impacts that the project will have on the business architecture have not been identified and defined. A thorough stakeholder analysis has not been performed. Discovery The solution scope has not been clearly defined as a set of features that can be delivered independently. Customers and users are not adequately engaged in project discovery activities. Delivery Delivery team satisfaction is low. Agile team commitments have not been met. Velocity is decreasing. Project Performance The project is trending 20% or more over its estimated budget. The project is trending 20% or more over its estimated deadline. Benefits Realization The client is extremely dissatisfied with the performance of the project team. Benefits as defined in the business case are not being achieved. Project Recovery Process Turning around a troubled project is never easy, but there are approaches that can be used that provide a good chance for success. It is important to note that success may not mean delivering the project within the original time and budget constraints. Rather the focus must now be on salvaging the project to ensure that the project addresses the business need and achieves the expected business outcomes. If...
by John Parker | Mar 7, 2014 | Business Analysis, Collaboration, Uncategorized |
In one of my recent blog articles, Risk Management: Business Analysis is a Huge Risk for Most Organizations, I stated that business analysis is at a dangerously low level of maturity for most organizations as evidenced by Standish Group Research, which analyzes project performance. Standish Group Research shows that the top five reasons for failed or challenged projects are: Lack of user involvement Lack of transparency Poor or incomplete requirements Changing requirements Lack of business alignment Now, examine these problems carefully; all of them are related to poor business analysis. Looking at this and other research, I firmly believe that poor business analysis is the number one cause of failed and challenged projects. According to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK), business analysis involves much more than just writing solution requirements. However, in many organizations, BAs only write solution requirements and do not perform other key activities specified in BABOK. For example, few business analysts are actually involved in Enterprise Analysis and Solution Assessment and Validation which are two key knowledge areas specified in the BABOK. Many people think that Requirements Analysis and business analysis are one in the same. Requirements Analysis is only one of the six knowledge areas in BABOK. It’s important to stress that there is much more to business analysis than just writing solution requirements. Many confuse requirements engineering and business analysis, thinking they are one in the same; however, they are not. Understanding the differences is key for successful IT projects. Requirements engineering, although helpful, is certainly not the key for success on business IT projects. Requirements engineering might address problems 3 and...
by Jenny Boronyak | Mar 5, 2014 | Agile, Project Management, Uncategorized |
In our previous blog on Dual-Track Agile, John Parker described the benefits of this emerging concept. Dual-track agile is an approach to agile development in which project teams are constantly working on the discovery and delivery of solutions that will deliver business value and obtain user adoption. By following the principles of dual-track agile, project managers and their teams can eliminate a lot of frustration and costs in agile development. Below are the key guidelines to implementing dual-track agile in your projects. 1. Put together a proficient discovery team with expert capabilities who are able to blend entrepreneurial skills and research gathered from the market. Your team needs to have the following skills so they can thoroughly and effectively understand the problem, recommend the best solution, and align the project with business needs: User Experience/User-Centered Design Business Analysis Pricing and Financial Analysis Customer Discovery Impact/Gap Analysis Focus on Collaboration Experimentation Attitude 2. Have the discovery team working one or more months ahead of the development team. The discovery team should be constantly populating the backlog with validated ideas and user stories. 3. With the help of the discovery team, create an understanding of your customers’ core problem before gathering ideas/features. Do not start putting together a solution until you have a complete understanding of the problem. Use Root Cause Analysis techniques like Fishbone Diagrams or The Five Whys to dig deep into the source of the problem and set the context for the project. 4. Develop a shared vision by hosting a vision planning workshop. Invite the product owner, business stakeholders, technical subject matter experts (SMEs), user-centered designers, and...
by Enfocus Solutions | Mar 3, 2014 | Business Analysis, Uncategorized |
I’ve written a fair number of requirement documents in my business analyst lifetime, and I’m still not sure what took longer – gathering and documenting the requirements, or trying to get the business to read and approve them. Let me know if this sounds familiar… You spend weeks, maybe months, eliciting requirements, reviewing requirements, and documenting requirements in a nicely formatted word document with the title Business Requirements Document (or something similar) slapped on the front. You are proud of the work you have done, the diagrams you have drawn, the requirements you have logically ordered and laid out for your stakeholders to read – and you’re sure that you have made it down right simple for anybody to just open it up and review it. You happily click send on the email, sure that your stakeholders will read it and send back their input within the requested time frame—after all, who wants to risk the project deadline, right? Problem is, usually stakeholders don’t have the time, or the space, to review a long—and let’s be honest—often boring, requirements document. Your priority as the BA to get the requirements document reviewed and approved is unfortunately often not their priority—and it’s extremely hard to make it so. Or even when you do get their input, what you receive is often not as meaningful as you were hoping—I remember on more than one occasion receiving a requirements document back with fewer comments about the requirements themselves than about the spelling or grammar style I chose to write it in. In today’s projects, where the dynamics of the solution is constantly shifting,...
